🚨 Controversy Alert! 🚨 The Metropolitan Police is in hot water after a plan was announced requiring officers to declare any membership with the Freemasons. This move follows recommendations from a report on Welsh detective Daniel Morgan’s murder, which highlighted past concerns about transparency due to masonic connections.
The Freemasons, including the United Grand Lodge of England, are not taking this lightly and are gearing up for legal action. They argue the declaration requirement is discriminatory and could tarnish their reputation, citing human rights and data privacy concerns.
Freemasons are pushing back, saying the Met’s consultation process was “wholly inadequate.” They’ve called for a sensible resolution, urging police leadership to reconsider the plan to avoid unnecessary legal battles and taxpayer costs. With only 440 Freemasons out of the Met’s 32,135 officers, their influence is questioned.
The Met’s decision comes after a survey where two-thirds of respondents felt such memberships could impact perceptions of police impartiality. This debate is fueling fiery discussions on transparency within the force. Should Freemason memberships be public knowledge, or is this a step too far? Let us know your thoughts below! 🔍🗣️ #PoliceTransparency #Freemasons #LegalChallenge #PublicTrust