The Ely riots trial in Cardiff is coming to a head as the jury prepares to consider verdicts for the seven accused. The trial revolves around the events of May 2023, when riots erupted following the tragic deaths of two young men. The prosecution team has argued that the actions of the defendants, which included stone-throwing and live streaming the riots, amounted to the legal offence of rioting, which could lead to a 10-year prison sentence.
During the trial, defence barristers have presented various arguments. Harry Baker, representing Lee Robinson, highlighted how police allegedly provoked tensions and questioned the charges against his client, noting a police officer had deemed him “boring.” Meanwhile, Hannah Friedman, defending McKenzie Danks, admitted her client assaulted officers but argued it was not part of a common plan with other rioters.
Andrew Kendal, defending Zayne Farrugia, argued his client acted out of personal anger and not collective intent, while Darren Snow, advocating for Jordan Bratcher, acknowledged the tragic context of the riots following the deaths of two teenagers but argued Bratcher’s involvement was limited to throwing a single stone.
The trial, marking the first legal proceedings related to these riots, attempts to untangle a complex web of anger, loss, and alleged criminal actions. With defendants ranging in age from 21 to 38, all have pleaded not guilty to charges under the Public Order Act 1986, which involves proving the intent and awareness of violence.
As the jury listens to the closing speeches, the community awaits the verdict, hoping for justice to bring some closure to a deeply painful chapter. Stay tuned for more updates as the trial wraps up, and share your thoughts on the situation.