Epping is in the spotlight as Council Leader Christopher Whitbread expresses deep disappointment over the government’s handling of asylum seekers being housed at the Bell Hotel. The Court of Appeal’s recent ruling overturned an injunction that would have halted the accommodation of 138 asylum seekers beyond September. This decision comes after several protests erupted due to a serious charge against an asylum seeker residing at the hotel.
Councillor Whitbread has criticised the lack of government consultation, arguing the move doesn’t suit Epping residents or the asylum seekers themselves. He stresses that previous governments had shut down such accommodation without due consideration, only for the current administration to reopen it in April without meaningful dialogue.
Concerns mount over safety and wellbeing, particularly with the Bell Hotel sitting close to homes and schools. Yet, the councillor warns against violent protests, which would only aid the government’s case. Cllr Whitbread has been vocal about the government needing to reconsider its stance, stressing that the issue overshadows genuine asylum needs.
Ken Williamson, from Epping Forest District Council, echoed these sentiments, highlighting a need for government accountability over the “trauma and disruption” faced by the community. He reassures residents that the fight isn’t over as the council prepares for a full legal hearing in October.
The judges noted that while the hotel owner previously sought planning permission for its use change, this application had stalled. Questions hover over why the process lagged, with some suggesting the company may not have actively pursued it.
As Epping’s local government remains steadfast in its efforts, the coming weeks will be crucial in determining a balanced resolution that protects both residents’ and asylum seekers’ rights. Stay tuned for further updates as this intricate situation continues to unfold.