Ex-Football Player Allegedly Attacks Sugababes Singer and Enforces Ban on Red Lipstick Usage

**Ex-Football Star Accused of Assault and Coercive Behaviour Toward Sugababes Singer**
Cardiff News Online Article Image

Traffic Updates
A former professional footballer has appeared in court facing a string of serious allegations involving his former partner, Keisha Buchanan, a founding member of the British pop group Sugababes. Taiwo Leo Atieno, 39, is accused of both physical assault and coercive control over a period spanning more than a decade, casting a shadow over his sporting legacy and raising broader questions about the private lives of public figures.
Cardiff Latest News

Mr. Atieno, who previously played for Luton Town in the English Football League as well as representing the Kenya national team, attended the hearing at Southwark’s Harrow Crown Court via video link from HMP Wormwood Scrubs, dressed formally in a suit and tie. The case unfolded before Judge Ian Bourne KC on Thursday, with the court opting to grant Atieno conditional bail pending further proceedings.

The former footballer currently faces a total of eight charges. Among these, he stands accused of assault causing actual bodily harm towards Ms Buchanan between the years 2012 and 2015. In addition, between December 2015 and May 2018, he is alleged to have engaged in coercive and controlling conduct, a charge which highlights the increasing use of legal measures to address non-physical forms of abuse.

According to prosecutors, Atieno’s actions were not limited to physical violence. Court documents allege that he imposed restrictions on Buchanan’s personal freedoms, monitoring her correspondence, dictating when she could use basic facilities such as the shower or gym, and even forbidding her from wearing red lipstick. It is said that these behaviours caused “serious alarm or distress” and a notable impact on Buchanan’s day-to-day life.

The court also heard that Atieno repeatedly breached a non-molestation order designed to protect Buchanan. Six counts of violation are being considered, including instances in July 2024 when he allegedly posted information about Buchanan to third parties online, as well as sending her emails on multiple dates later that year. These breaches further complicate the legal proceedings and point to ongoing contact despite judicial restrictions.

Judge Bourne KC set out very clear bail conditions for Atieno, ordering him to surrender his passport and barring any kind of communication with Ms Buchanan—either directly or indirectly—by email, social media, or any other means. The defendant has also been instructed not to enter the London Borough of Barnet or make application for international travel, as the case continues to develop.

Atieno’s legal representative, Julian Malins KC, assured the court that his client understood and would comply with all conditions set. A further court session has been scheduled for 22 August 2025, at which point Atieno is expected to enter his pleas. If the case moves forward, a trial is set for April 2026.

Keisha Buchanan initially found fame as a teenager, forming the Sugababes in 1998 alongside Mutya Buena and Siobhan Donaghy. Over the years, the group has seen numerous line-up changes, with Buchanan herself being replaced in 2009. The original trio later regained their rights to the Sugababes name, reuniting in 2022 to perform at Glastonbury and sparking fresh interest in their legacy.

While the current proceedings focus on distressing personal issues, the case brings to the forefront ongoing conversations about abuse in high-profile relationships, the intersection of fame and vulnerability, and the judicial system’s evolving capacity to address complex forms of domestic misconduct. As the legal process continues, both the sports and entertainment communities await further details with keen interest, mindful of both Buchanan’s well-being and the broader implications for safeguarding in public life.

Further updates are expected as proceedings continue, with all parties reminded that allegations remain unproven at this stage. The outcome of the case may play a significant role in shaping public discourse around privacy, security, and the rights of individuals within the sphere of celebrity.