In a heated Cardiff Council debate, a motion by the Conservatives to stop housing asylum seekers in city hotels was overwhelmingly voted down. The proposal aimed to halt the accommodation of asylum seekers who have entered the UK unlawfully and sought to investigate planning permission for these hotels. Critics slammed the move, with many labelling it a “shameful” and “disgraceful” attack on vulnerable individuals.
Councillor Calum Davies argued that using hotels for asylum seekers is undermining the housing market, citing over 9,000 households in Cardiff waiting for housing. He criticized the UK Government for its management of the asylum system and lack of transparency.
Meanwhile, the Liberal Democrats highlighted the right to seek asylum under international law, urging action against people-smuggling and lifting work bans for asylum seekers waiting over three months for decisions.
Labour’s Peter Wong criticised the divisive approach, calling for unity and understanding, while fellow councillor Imran Latif pointed out that asylum seekers make up a tiny fraction of the population.
With over 1,900 asylum seekers in Cardiff, including those from Ukraine and Afghanistan, the debate reflects ongoing national challenges in handling asylum arrivals.
The UK Government continues efforts to reform the asylum process, reducing hotel reliance and speeding up decisions. Cardiff remains committed to welcoming those in need, standing against the motion’s divisive stance.
What are your thoughts on the issue? How should the city balance housing needs with supporting asylum seekers? Join the conversation below! ⬇️