**Man Breaches Restraining Order by Returning to Ex-partner’s Home Days After Court Ban**


A Carmarthenshire man has admitted to breaching a court order by turning up at the home of his former partner, just days after magistrates instructed him not to contact her or visit her address. Bobby England, aged 34, was previously handed a restraining order following a violent domestic incident, but soon returned to confront his ex, triggering swift police intervention.
England, of Llangunnor, Carmarthen, was earlier brought before Llanelli Magistrates’ Court on 9 June, charged with assault by beating. The court heard he had headbutted his former partner and left her with injuries to her arm, prompting the imposition of a two-year protection order aimed at safeguarding the victim from further harm. Under the strict terms of the ban, England was forbidden from making contact with the woman or appearing at her home.

However, reports indicate that less than a week after sentencing, the defendant returned to the woman’s property. The incident occurred shortly after the victim arrived home from visiting friends. According to court accounts, England came to the house demanding the return of his toolbox, disregarding the active protective order. The confrontation allegedly escalated, with England shouting abuse at his ex-partner.
Thanks to her quick thinking, the victim was able to alert emergency services by dialling 999, acting before the situation could worsen. Law enforcement officers responded promptly, managing to track down and arrest England within half an hour of the breach. Their rapid response is being credited with preventing a possible escalation and ensuring the woman’s immediate safety.
At a subsequent hearing, England pleaded guilty to breaching the restraining order, as well as a separate charge of possession of cannabis or cannabis resin. The court handed down a 12-week prison sentence, suspended for 12 months, and ordered England to pay £85 in court costs and a £154 victim surcharge. He will also be required to wear an electronic tag for six months, enabling authorities to monitor his compliance with court restrictions.
In an effort to further protect the victim, additional security measures have now been implemented at her home. These include repairs and upgrades to doors and locks, as well as the installation of a panic alarm, a wireless doorbell, and enhanced security equipment. According to sources familiar with the case, these measures are part of a comprehensive safeguarding plan designed to help survivors of domestic abuse feel safe in their own residences, reducing the need for them to leave their homes or communities.
Domestic violence charities and campaigners have hailed the swift intervention and the support provided to the victim. They point to the case as a reminder that court-imposed orders, while an important step, can sometimes prove insufficient on their own to deter persistent offenders. Effective policing, robust safeguards, and ongoing support remain crucial in the effort to protect vulnerable individuals.
Local authorities have reiterated their commitment to assisting victims, advising anyone experiencing domestic abuse to seek help from police and specialist services. There is growing recognition that addressing the aftermath of such incidents requires a multipronged approach, including legal, practical, and emotional support.
This case stands as a stark illustration of the challenges faced by those subject to domestic abuse, and the need for all sectors of the justice system to work cohesively. It also highlights the vital importance of community vigilance, quick police action, and continued investment in victim protection.